12849 0 false 2009-06-24T17:07:18+02:00 36343 49 lm_utils_get_localtime-uses-tm_gmtoff-uninitialized 6 17276 new 2009-06-24T17:07:23+02:00 36343 wjt wjt Kirk Haines http://loudmouth.lighthouseapp.com/projects/17276/tickets/49 Hi, I just noticed that lm_utils_get_localtime fills in a few fields of an uninitialized, stack-allocated time_t, then uses the tm_gmtoff field without ever initializing it. This is never going to work. :-) Surely the function could be basically replaced by strptime()? Hi, I just noticed that lm_utils_get_localtime fills in a few fields of an uninitialized, stack-allocated time_t, then uses the tm_gmtoff field without ever initializing it. This is never going to work. :-) Surely the function could be basically replaced by strptime()? <div><p>Hi,</p> <p>I just noticed that lm_utils_get_localtime fills in a few fields of an uninitialized, stack-allocated time_t, then uses the tm_gmtoff field without ever initializing it. This is never going to work. :-) Surely the function could be basically replaced by strptime()?</p></div> 12849 0 Hi, I just noticed that lm_utils_get_localtime fills in a few fields of an uninitialized, stack-allocated time_t, then uses the tm_gmtoff field without ever initializing it. This is never going to work. :-) Surely the function could be basically replaced by strptime()? <div><p>Hi,</p> <p>I just noticed that lm_utils_get_localtime fills in a few fields of an uninitialized, stack-allocated time_t, then uses the tm_gmtoff field without ever initializing it. This is never going to work. :-) Surely the function could be basically replaced by strptime()?</p></div> false 2009-06-24T17:07:18+02:00 36343 --- {} 49 lm_utils_get_localtime-uses-tm_gmtoff-uninitialized 0 17276 new 2009-06-24T17:07:23+02:00 36343 wjt wjt Kirk Haines http://loudmouth.lighthouseapp.com/projects/17276/tickets/49